In so far as EVIL exists, the root of evil is in Matter; but EVIL does not exist; all that exists, in a half-existence, is the last effort of The Good, the point at which The Good ceases because, so to speak, endlessness has all but faded out to an end. If this seem too violent a paradox to be even mentioned amongst us, we must remember that it is to some degree merely metaphorical, like so much in Plotinus: it is the almost desperate effort to express a combined idea that seems to be instinctive in the mind of man, the idea that Good is all-reaching and yet that it has degrees, that an infinitely powerful Wisdom exists and operates and casts an infinite splendour on all its works while we ourselves can see, or think we see, its failures or the last and feeblest rays of its light.
Since EVIL is here, “haunting this world by necessary law,” and it is the Soul’s design to escape from EVIL, we must escape hence. Enneads I,2,
It can scarcely prove to be The Good: The Absolute Good cannot be thought to have taken up its abode with EVIL. We can think of it only as something of the nature of good but paying a double allegiance and unable to rest in the Authentic Good. Enneads I,2,
But if the mingled strand of life is to us, though entwined with evil, still in the total a good, must not death be an evil? EVIL to What? There must be a subject for the evil: but if the possible subject is no longer among beings, or, still among beings, is devoid of life… why, a stone is not more immune. Enneads I,7,
Those enquiring whence EVIL enters into beings, or rather into a certain order of beings, would be making the best beginning if they established, first of all, what precisely EVIL is, what constitutes its Nature. At once we should know whence it comes, where it has its native seat and where it is present merely as an accident; and there would be no further question as to whether it has Authentic-Existence. Enneads I,8,
But a difficulty arises. By what faculty in us could we possibly know EVIL? All knowing comes by likeness. The Intellectual-Principle and the Soul, being Ideal-Forms, would know Ideal-Forms and would have a natural tendency towards them; but who could imagine EVIL to be an Ideal-Form, seeing that it manifests itself as the very absence of Good? If the solution is that the one act of knowing covers contraries, and that as EVIL is the contrary to Good the one act would grasp Good and EVIL together, then to know EVIL there must be first a clear perception and understanding of Good, since the nobler existences precede the baser and are Ideal-Forms while the less good hold no such standing, are nearer to Non-Being. Enneads I,8,
No doubt there is a question in what precise way Good is contrary to EVIL – whether it is as First-Principle to last of things or as Ideal-Form to utter Lack: but this subject we postpone. Enneads I,8,
Such is the untroubled, the blissful, life of divine beings, and EVIL has no place in it; if this were all, there would be no EVIL but Good only, the first, the second and the third Good. All, thus far, is with the King of All, unfailing Cause of Good and Beauty and controller of all; and what is Good in the second degree depends upon the Second-Principle and tertiary Good upon the Third. Enneads I,8,
If such be the Nature of Beings and of That which transcends all the realm of Being, EVIL cannot have place among Beings or in the Beyond-Being; these are good. Enneads I,8,
There remains, only, if EVIL exist at all, that it be situate in the realm of Non-Being, that it be some mode, as it were, of the Non-Being, that it have its seat in something in touch with Non-Being or to a certain degree communicate in Non-Being. Enneads I,8,
In what substantial-form (hypostasis) then is all this to be found – not as accident but as the very substance itself? For if EVIL can enter into other things, it must have in a certain sense a prior existence, even though it may not be an essence. As there is Good, the Absolute, as well as Good, the quality, so, together with the derived evil entering into something not itself, there must be the Absolute EVIL. Enneads I,8,
There must, then, be some Undetermination-Absolute, some Absolute Formlessness; all the qualities cited as characterizing the Nature of EVIL must be summed under an Absolute EVIL; and every evil thing outside of this must either contain this Absolute by saturation or have taken the character of evil and become a cause of evil by consecration to this Absolute. Enneads I,8,
What will this be? That Kind whose place is below all the patterns, forms, shapes, measurements and limits, that which has no trace of good by any title of its own, but (at best) takes order and grace from some Principle outside itself, a mere image as regards Absolute-Being but the Authentic Essence of EVIL – in so far as EVIL can have Authentic Being. In such a Kind, Reason recognizes the Primal EVIL, EVIL Absolute. Enneads I,8,
But, it will be objected, if this seeing and frequenting of the darkness is due to the lack of good, the Soul’s evil has its source in that very lack; the darkness will be merely a secondary cause – and at once the Principle of EVIL is removed from Matter, is made anterior to Matter. Enneads I,8,
No: EVIL is not in any and every lack; it is in absolute lack. What falls in some degree short of the Good is not EVIL; considered in its own kind it might even be perfect, but where there is utter dearth, there we have Essential EVIL, void of all share in Good; this is the case with Matter. Enneads I,8,
Mere lack brings merely Not-Goodness: EVIL demands the absolute lack – though, of course, any very considerable shortcoming makes the ultimate fall possible and is already, in itself, an evil. Enneads I,8,
In fine we are not to think of EVIL as some particular bad thing – injustice, for example, or any other ugly trait – but as a principle distinct from any of the particular forms in which, by the addition of certain elements, it becomes manifest. Thus there may be wickedness in the Soul; the forms this general wickedness is to take will be determined by the environing Matter, by the faculties of the Soul that operate and by the nature of their operation, whether seeing, acting, or merely admitting impression. Enneads I,8,
But supposing things external to the Soul are to be counted EVIL – sickness, poverty and so forth – how can they be referred to the principle we have described? Well, sickness is excess or defect in the body, which as a material organism rebels against order and measure; ugliness is but matter not mastered by Ideal-Form; poverty consists in our need and lack of goods made necessary to us by our association with Matter whose very nature is to be one long want. Enneads I,8,
If all this be true, we cannot be, ourselves, the source of EVIL, we are not evil in ourselves; EVIL was before we came to be; the EVIL which holds men down binds them against their will; and for those that have the strength – not found in all men, it is true – there is a deliverance from the evils that have found lodgement in the soul. Enneads I,8,
In a word since Matter belongs only to the sensible world, vice in men is not the Absolute EVIL; not all men are vicious; some overcome vice, some, the better sort, are never attacked by it; and those who master it win by means of that in them which is not material. Enneads I,8,
If this be so, how do we explain the teaching that evils can never pass away but “exist of necessity,” that “while evil has no place in the divine order, it haunts mortal nature and this place for ever”? Does this mean that heaven is clear of evil, ever moving its orderly way, spinning on the appointed path, no injustice There or any flaw, no wrong done by any power to any other but all true to the settled plan, while injustice and disorder prevail on earth, designated as “the Mortal Kind and this Place”? Not quite so: for the precept to “flee hence” does not refer to earth and earthly life. The flight we read of consists not in quitting earth but in living our earth-life “with justice and piety in the light of philosophy”; it is vice we are to flee, so that clearly to the writer EVIL is simply vice with the sequels of vice. And when the disputant in that dialogue says that, if men could be convinced of the doctrine advanced, there would be an end of EVIL, he is answered, “That can never be: EVIL is of necessity, for there must be a contrary to good.” Enneads I,8,
But why does the existence of the Principle of Good necessarily comport the existence of a Principle of EVIL? Is it because the All necessarily comports the existence of Matter? Yes: for necessarily this All is made up of contraries: it could not exist if Matter did not. The Nature of this Kosmos is, therefore, a blend; it is blended from the Intellectual-Principle and Necessity: what comes into it from God is good; evil is from the Ancient Kind which, we read, is the underlying Matter not yet brought to order by the Ideal-Form. Enneads I,8,
There is another consideration establishing the necessary existence of EVIL. Enneads I,8,
Given that The Good is not the only existent thing, it is inevitable that, by the outgoing from it or, if the phrase be preferred, the continuous down-going or away-going from it, there should be produced a Last, something after which nothing more can be produced: this will be EVIL. Enneads I,8,
As necessarily as there is Something after the First, so necessarily there is a Last: this Last is Matter, the thing which has no residue of good in it: here is the necessity of EVIL. Enneads I,8,
They will say that neither ignorance nor wicked desires arise in Matter. Even if they admit that the unhappy condition within us is due to the pravity inherent in body, they will urge that still the blame lies not in the Matter itself but with the Form present in it – such Form as heat, cold, bitterness, saltness and all other conditions perceptible to sense, or again such states as being full or void – not in the concrete signification but in the presence or absence of just such forms. In a word, they will argue, all particularity in desires and even in perverted judgements upon things, can be referred to such causes, so that EVIL lies in this Form much more than in the mere Matter. Enneads I,8,
Yet, even with all this, they can be compelled to admit that Matter is the EVIL. Enneads I,8,
No, if body is the cause of EVIL, then there is no escape; the cause of EVIL is Matter. Enneads I,8,
To resume: the Measureless is evil primarily; whatever, either by resemblance or participation, exists in the state of unmeasure, is evil secondarily, by force of its dealing with the Primal – primarily, the darkness; secondarily, the darkened. Now, Vice, being an ignorance and a lack of measure in the Soul, is secondarily evil, not the Essential EVIL, just as Virtue is not the Primal Good but is Likeness to The Good, or participation in it. Enneads I,8,
But what approach have we to the knowing of Good and EVIL? And first of the EVIL of soul: Virtue, we may know by the Intellectual-Principle and by means of the philosophic habit; but Vice? A a ruler marks off straight from crooked, so Vice is known by its divergence from the line of Virtue. Enneads I,8,
We see partial wrong; from what is before us we divine that which is lacking to the entire form (or Kind) thus indicated; we see that the completed Kind would be the Indeterminate; by this process we are able to identify and affirm EVIL. In the same way when we observe what we feel to be an ugly appearance in Matter – left there because the Reason-Principle has not become so completely the master as to cover over the unseemliness – we recognise Ugliness by the falling-short from Ideal-Form. Enneads I,8,
But if Matter is devoid of quality how can it be evil? It is described as being devoid of quality in the sense only that it does not essentially possess any of the qualities which it admits and which enter into it as into a substratum. No one says that it has no nature; and if it has any nature at all, why may not that nature be evil though not in the sense of quality? Quality qualifies something not itself: it is therefore an accidental; it resides in some other object. Matter does not exist in some other object but is the substratum in which the accidental resides. Matter, then, is said to be devoid of Quality in that it does not in itself possess this thing which is by nature an accidental. If, moreover, Quality itself be devoid of Quality, how can Matter, which is the unqualified, be said to have it? Thus, it is quite correct to say at once that Matter is without Quality and that it is evil: it is EVIL not in the sense of having Quality but, precisely, in not having it; give it Quality and in its very EVIL it would almost be a Form, whereas in Truth it is a Kind contrary to Form. Enneads I,8,
“But,” it may be said, “the Kind opposed to all Form is Privation or Negation, and this necessarily refers to something other than itself, it is no Substantial-Existence: therefore if EVIL is Privation or Negation it must be lodged in some Negation of Form: there will be no Self-Existent EVIL.” Enneads I,8,
This objection may be answered by applying the principle to the case of EVIL in the Soul; the EVIL, the Vice, will be a Negation and not anything having a separate existence; we come to the doctrine which denies Matter or, admitting it, denies its EVIL; we need not seek elsewhere; we may at once place EVIL in the Soul, recognising it as the mere absence of Good. But if the negation is the negation of something that ought to become present, if it is a denial of the Good by the Soul, then the Soul produces vice within itself by the operation of its own Nature, and is devoid of good and, therefore, Soul though it be, devoid of life: the Soul, if it has no life, is soulless; the Soul is no Soul. Enneads I,8,
No; the Soul has life by its own nature and therefore does not, of its own nature, contain this negation of The Good: it has much good in it; it carries a happy trace of the Intellectual-Principle and is not essentially evil: neither is it primally evil nor is that Primal EVIL present in it even as an accidental, for the Soul is not wholly apart from the Good. Enneads I,8,
Perhaps Vice and EVIL as in the Soul should be described not as an entire, but as a partial, negation of good. Enneads I,8,
But if this were so, part of the Soul must possess The Good, part be without it; the Soul will have a mingled nature and the EVIL within it will not be unblended: we have not yet lighted on the Primal, Unmingled EVIL. The Soul would possess the Good as its Essence, the EVIL as an Accidental. Enneads I,8,
Perhaps EVIL is merely an impediment to the Soul like something affecting the eye and so hindering sight. Enneads I,8,
But such an evil in the eyes is no more than an occasion of evil, the Absolute EVIL is something quite different. If then Vice is an impediment to the Soul, Vice is an occasion of evil but not EVIL-Absolute. Virtue is not the Absolute Good, but a co-operator with it; and if Virtue is not the Absolute Good neither is Vice the Absolute EVIL. Virtue is not the Absolute Beauty or the Absolute Good; neither, therefore, is Vice the Essential Ugliness or the Essential EVIL. Enneads I,8,
We teach that Virtue is not the Absolute GoodGood and Beauty, because we know that These are earlier than Virtue and transcend it, and that it is good and beautiful by some participation in them. Now as, going upward from virtue, we come to the Beautiful and to the Good, so, going downward from Vice, we reach Essential EVIL: from Vice as the starting-point we come to vision of EVIL, as far as such vision is possible, and we become evil to the extent of our participation in it. We are become dwellers in the Place of Unlikeness, where, fallen from all our resemblance to the Divine, we lie in gloom and mud: for if the Soul abandons itself unreservedly to the extreme of viciousness, it is no longer a vicious Soul merely, for mere vice is still human, still carries some trace of good: it has taken to itself another nature, the EVIL, and as far as Soul can die it is dead. And the death of Soul is twofold: while still sunk in body to lie down in Matter and drench itself with it; when it has left the body, to lie in the other world until, somehow, it stirs again and lifts its sight from the mud: and this is our “going down to Hades and slumbering there.” Enneads I,8,
The evil of Matter precedes the weakness, the vice; it is Primal EVIL. Even though the Soul itself submits to Matter and engenders to it; if it becomes evil within itself by its commerce with Matter, the cause is still the presence of Matter: the Soul would never have approached Matter but that the presence of Matter is the occasion of its earth-life. Enneads I,8,
To deny EVIL a place among realities is necessarily to do away with the Good as well, and even to deny the existence of anything desirable; it is to deny desire, avoidance and all intellectual act; for desire has Good for its object, aversion looks to EVIL; all intellectual act, all Wisdom, deals with Good and Bad, and is itself one of the things that are good. Enneads I,8,
There must then be The Good – good unmixed – and the Mingled Good and Bad, and the Rather Bad than Good, this last ending with the Utterly Bad we have been seeking, just as that in which EVIL constitutes the lesser part tends, by that lessening, towards the Good. Enneads I,8,
What, then, must EVIL be to the Soul? What Soul could contain EVIL unless by contact with the lower Kind? There could be no desire, no sorrow, no rage, no fear: fear touches the compounded dreading its dissolution; pain and sorrow are the accompaniments of the dissolution; desires spring from something troubling the grouped being or are a provision against trouble threatened; all impression is the stroke of something unreasonable outside the Soul, accepted only because the Soul is not devoid of parts or phases; the Soul takes up false notions through having gone outside of its own truth by ceasing to be purely itself. Enneads I,8,
EVIL is not alone: by virtue of the nature of Good, the power of Good, it is not EVIL only: it appears, necessarily, bound around with bonds of Beauty, like some captive bound in fetters of gold; and beneath these it is hidden so that, while it must exist, it may not be seen by the gods, and that men need not always have evil before their eyes, but that when it comes before them they may still be not destitute of Images of the Good and Beautiful for their Remembrance. Enneads I,8,
But where the bringing to order must cut through to the very nature, the base original must be transmuted: it can leave ugliness for beauty only by a change of substance. Matter, then, thus brought to order must lose its own nature in the supreme degree unless its baseness is an accidental: if it is base in the sense of being Baseness the Absolute, it could never participate in order, and, if evil in the sense of being EVIL the Absolute, it could never participate in good. Enneads III,6,
If we are asked how the evil thing can have tendency towards the good, we answer that we have not attributed tendency to Matter; our argument needed the hypothesis of sensation in Matter – in so far as possible consistently with retention of its character – and we asserted that the entry of Form, that dream of the Good, must raise it to a nobler order. If then Matter is EVIL, there is no more to be said; if it is something else – a wrong thing, let us say – then in the hypothesis that its essence acquire sensation would not the appropriate upon the next or higher plane be its good, as in the other cases? But not what is evil in Matter would be the quester of good but that element in it (lowest Form) which in it is associated with evil. Enneads VI,7,
But if Matter by very essence is evil how could it choose the good? This question implies that if EVIL were self-conscious it would admire itself: but how can the unadmirable be admired; and did we not discover that the good must be apt to the nature? There that question may rest. But if universally the good is Form and the higher the ascent the more there is of Form-Soul more truly Form than body is and phases of soul progressively of higher Form and Intellectual-Principle standing as Form to soul collectively – then the Good advances by the opposite of Matter and, therefore, by a cleansing and casting away to the utmost possible at each stage: and the greatest good must be there where all that is of Matter has disappeared. The Principle of Good rejecting Matter entirely – or rather never having come near it at any point or in any way – must hold itself aloft with that Formless in which Primal Form takes its origin. But we will return to this. Enneads VI,7,