Soc. And I affirm that he is most miserable, and that those who are punished are less miserable — are you going to refute this proposition also ?
Pol. A proposition which is harder of refutation than the other, Socrates.
Soc. Say rather, Polus, impossible ; for who can refute the truth ?
Pol. What do you mean ? If a man is detected in an unjust attempt to make himself a tyrant, and when detected is racked, mutilated, has his eyes burned out, and after having had all sorts of great injuries inflicted on him, and having seen his wife and children suffer the like, is at last impaled or tarred and burned alive, will he be happier than if he escape and become a tyrant, and continue all through life doing what he likes and holding the reins of government, the envy and admiration both of citizens and strangers ? Is that the paradox which, as you say, cannot be refuted ?
Soc. There again, noble Polus, you are raising hobgoblins instead of refuting me ; just now you were calling witnesses against me. But please to refresh my memory a little ; did you say — “in an unjust attempt to make himself a tyrant” ?
Pol. Yes, I did.
Soc. Then I say that neither of them will be happier than the other — neither he who unjustly acquires a tyranny, nor he who suffers in the attempt, for of two miserables one cannot be the happier, but that he who escapes and becomes a tyrant is the more miserable of the two. Do you laugh, Polus ? Well, this is a new kind of refutation — when any one says anything, instead of refuting him to laugh at him.
Pol. But do you not think, Socrates, that you have been sufficiently refuted, when you say that which no human being will allow ? Ask the company.
Soc. O Polus, I am not a public man, and only last year, when my tribe were serving as Prytanes, and it became my duty as their president to take the votes, there was a laugh at me, because I was unable to take them. And as I failed then, you must not ask me to count the suffrages of the company now ; but if, as I was saying, you have no better argument than numbers, let me have a turn, and do you make trial of the sort of proof which, as I think, is required ; for I shall produce one witness only of the truth of my words, and he is the person with whom I am arguing ; his suffrage I know how to take ; but with the many I have nothing to do, and do not even address myself to them. May I ask then whether you will answer in turn and have your words put to the proof ? For I certainly think that I and you and every man do really believe, that to do is a greater evil than to suffer injustice : and not to be punished than to be punished.
Pol. And I should say neither I, nor any man : would you yourself, for example, suffer rather than do injustice ?
Soc. Yes, and you, too ; I or any man would.
Pol. Quite the reverse ; neither you, nor I, nor any man.
Soc. But will you answer ?
Pol. To be sure, I will — for I am curious to hear what you can have to say.
Soc. Tell me, then, and you will know, and let us suppose that I am beginning at the beginning : which of the two, Polus, in your opinion, is the worst ? — to do injustice or to suffer ?
Pol. I should say that suffering was worst.
Soc. And which is the greater disgrace ? — Answer.
Pol. To do.
Soc. And the greater disgrace is the greater evil ?
Pol. Certainly not.
Soc. I understand you to say, if I am not mistaken, that the honourable is not the same as the good, or the disgraceful as the evil ?
Pol. Certainly not.
Soc. Let me ask a question of you : When you speak of beautiful things, such as bodies, colours, figures, sounds, institutions, do you not call them beautiful in reference to some standard : bodies, for example, are beautiful in proportion as they are useful, or as the sight of them gives pleasure to the spectators ; can you give any other account of personal beauty ?
Pol. I cannot.
Soc. And you would say of figures or colours generally that they were beautiful, either by reason of the pleasure which they give, or of their use, or both ?
Pol. Yes, I should.
Soc. And you would call sounds and music beautiful for the same reason ?
Pol. I should. Soc. Laws and institutions also have no beauty in them except in so far as they are useful or pleasant or both ?
Pol. I think not.
Soc. And may not the same be said of the beauty of knowledge ?
Pol. To be sure, Socrates ; and I very much approve of your measuring beauty by the standard of pleasure and utility.
Soc. And deformity or disgrace may be equally measured by the opposite standard of pain and evil ?
Pol. Certainly.
Soc. Then when of two beautiful things one exceeds in beauty, the measure of the excess is to be taken in one or both of these ; that is to say, in pleasure or utility or both ?
Pol. Very true.
Soc. And of two deformed things, that which exceeds in deformity or disgrace, exceeds either in pain or evil — must it not be so ?
Pol. Yes.
Soc. But then again, what was the observation which you just now made, about doing and suffering wrong ? Did you not say, that suffering wrong was more evil, and doing wrong more disgraceful ?
Pol. I did.
Soc. Then, if doing wrong is more disgraceful than suffering, the more disgraceful must be more painful and must exceed in pain or in evil or both : does not that also follow ?
Pol. Of course.
Soc. First, then, let us consider whether the doing of injustice exceeds the suffering in the consequent pain : Do the injurers suffer more than the injured ?
Pol. No, Socrates ; certainly not.
Soc. Then they do not exceed in pain ?
Pol. No.
Soc. But if not in pain, then not in both ?
Pol. Certainly not.
Soc. Then they can only exceed in the other ?
Pol. Yes.
Soc. That is to say, in evil ?
Pol. True.
Soc. Then doing injustice will have an excess of evil, and will therefore be a greater evil than suffering injustice ?
Pol. Clearly.
Soc. But have not you and the world already agreed that to do injustice is more disgraceful than to suffer ?
Pol. Yes.
Soc. And that is now discovered to be more evil ?
Pol. True.
Soc. And would you prefer a greater evil or a greater dishonour to a less one ? Answer, Polus, and fear not ; for you will come to no harm if you nobly resign yourself into the healing hand of the argument as to a physician without shrinking, and either say “Yes” or “No” to me.
Pol. I should say “No.”
Soc. Would any other man prefer a greater to a less evil ?
Pol. No, not according to this way of putting the case, Socrates.
Soc. Then I said truly, Polus that neither you, nor I, nor any man, would rather, do than suffer injustice ; for to do injustice is the greater evil of the two.
Pol. That is the conclusion.
Soc. You see, Polus, when you compare the two kinds of refutations, how unlike they are. All men, with the exception of myself, are of your way of thinking ; but your single assent and witness are enough for me — I have no need of any other, I take your suffrage, and am regardless of the rest.