And now, let us go back once more to the beginning, and see whether these or some other consequences will follow.
Let us do as you say.
If one is not, we ask what will happen in respect of one ? That is the question.
Yes.
Do not the words “is not” signify absence of being in that to which we apply them ?
Just so.
And when we say that a thing is not, do we mean that it is not in one way but is in another ? or do we mean, absolutely, that what is not has in no sort or way or kind participation of being ?
Quite absolutely.
Then, that which is not cannot be, or in any way participate in being ?
It cannot.
And did we not mean by becoming, and being destroyed, the assumption of being and the loss of being ?
Nothing else.
And can that which has no participation in being, either assume or lose being ?
Impossible.
The one then, since it in no way is, cannot have or lose or assume being in any way ?
True.
Then the one that is not, since it in no way partakes of being, neither nor becomes ?
No.
Then it is not altered at all ; for if it were it would become and be destroyed ?
True.
But if it be not altered it cannot be moved ?
Certainly not.
Nor can we say that it stands, if it is nowhere ; for that which stands must always be in one and the same spot ?
Of course.
Then we must say that the one which is not never stands still and never moves ?
Neither.
Nor is there any existing thing which can be attributed to it ; for if there had been, it would partake of being ?
That is clear.
And therefore neither smallness, nor greatness, nor equality, can be attributed to it ?
No.
Nor yet likeness nor difference, either in relation to itself or to others ?
Clearly not.
Well, and if nothing should be attributed to it, can other things be attributed to it ?
Certainly not.
And therefore other things can neither be like or unlike, the same, or different in relation to it ?
They cannot.
Nor can what is not, be anything, or be this thing, or be related to or the attribute of this or that or other, or be past, present, or future. Nor can knowledge, or opinion, or perception, or expression, or name, or any other thing that is, have any concern with it ?
No.
Then the one that is not has no condition of any kind ?
Such appears to be the conclusion.