Sensible Quality

But the beauty in the germ, in the particular Reason-Principle – is this the same as the manifested beauty, or do they coincide only in name? Are we to assign this beauty – and the same question applies to deformity in the soul – to the Intellectual order, or to the Sensible? That beauty is different in the two spheres is by now clear. If it be embraced in SENSIBLE QUALITY, then virtue must also be classed among the qualities of the lower. But merely some virtues will take rank as Sensible, others as Intellectual qualities. Enneads VI,3,16

Geometry and arithmetic are, we shall maintain, of a twofold character; in their earthly types they rank with SENSIBLE QUALITY, but in so far as they are functions of pure Soul, they necessarily belong to that other world in close proximity to the Intellectual. This, too, is in Plato’s view the case with music and astronomy. Enneads VI,3,16

The arts concerned with material objects and making use of perceptible instruments and sense-perception must be classed with SENSIBLE QUALITY, even though they are dispositions of the Soul, attendant upon its apostasy. Enneads VI,3,16

Are we, then, to rank the individual soul, as containing these Reason-Principles, with Sensible Substance? But we do not even identify the Principles with body; we merely include them in SENSIBLE QUALITY on the ground that they are connected with body and are activities of body. The constituents of Sensible Substance have already been specified; we have no intention whatever of adding to them Substance bodiless. Enneads VI,3,16