Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 20-23) – Relations between soul and body

E. RELATIONS BETWEEN SOUL AND BODY.

if functions are not localized the soul will not seem entirely within us.
space is corporeal; the body is within the soul.
nor is the body a vase, for proximate transmission of the soul.
many metaphysical objections to the conception of soul as localized.
nor is the soul in the body as a quality in a substrate.
nor is the soul in the body as a part in the whole.
nor is the soul in the body as a whole in a part.
nor will the soul be in the body as form in matter.
the soul is said to be in the body because the body alone is visible.
this leaves the question of the manner of the soul’s presence.
the soul in a body as a pilot in a ship.
the soul present in the body as light in air.
while the soul-power is everywhere, the principle of action is localized in the special organ.
reason is in the head, but not in the brain, which is the seat of the intermediary, the power of sensation.
growth is localized in the liver, anger in the heart.

Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 27) – MEMORY BELONGS BOTH TO THE DIVINE SOUL, AND TO THAT DERIVED FROM THE WORLD-SOUL
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 28) – MEMORY DOES NOT BELONG TO APPETITE
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 29) – MEMORY DOES NOT BELONG TO THE FACULTY OF SENSATION
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 3) — Consciousness of some part of the body to the whole consciousness?
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 30) – INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTIONS ARE NOT ENTIRELY PRESERVED BY IMAGINATION
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 31) – THE TWO KINDS OF MEMORY IMPLY TWO KINDS OF IMAGINATION
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 4) — Intellectual difficulty of the soul being one and yet in all beings.
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 5) — Souls retain both their unity and differences on different levels.
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 6) — Why should creation be predicated of the universal soul and not of the human?
Guthrie: Tratado 27 (IV, 3, 7) — Difference between individual and universal souls.