Is it any explanation to say that desire is vested in a Faculty-of-desire and anger in the Irascible-Faculty and, collectively, that all tendency is seated in the Appetitive-Faculty? Such a statement of the facts does not help towards making the affections common to the Couplement; they might still be seated either in the Soul alone or in the body alone. On the one hand if the appetite is to be stirred, as in the carnal passion, there must be a heating of the blood and the bile, a well-defined state of the body; on the other hand, the impulse towards The Good cannot be a joint affection, but, like certain others too, it would belong necessarily to the Soul alone. Enneads: I. I. 5
Faculty-of-desire
- Aubry: Tratado 53 – Comentários
- Bouillet: Tratado 53 (I, 1) – QU’EST-CE QUE L’ANIMAL, QU’EST-CE QUE L’HOMME ?
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,1 (I, 1, 1) — Distinções psicológicas na alma
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,10 (I, 1, 10) — Distinções entre “nós” e o “homem real”
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,11 (I, 1, 11) — O princípio superior nem sempre utilizado
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,12 (I, 1, 12) — A alma ao mesmo tempo impassível e castigável
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,13 (I, 1, 13) — Relação do “nós” e da “alma”
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,2 (I, 1, 2) — A alma como um agregado composto
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,3 (I, 1, 3) — A alma usa o corpo como instrumento
- Bouillet: Tratado 53,4 (I, 1, 4) — Consequências da mistura de alma e corpo